Commitments and Contingencies |
3 Months Ended |
|---|---|
Mar. 31, 2024 | |
| Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract] | |
| Commitments and Contingencies | Commitments and Contingencies Purchase Commitments
As of March 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023, our commitments included approximately $57.7 million and $62.5 million, respectively, of our open purchase orders and contractual obligations that occurred in the ordinary course of business, including commitments with contract manufacturers and suppliers for which we have not received goods or services, commitments for capital expenditures and construction-related activities for which we have not received the services. Although open purchase orders are considered enforceable and legally binding, the terms generally allow us an option to cancel, reschedule, and adjust its requirements based on our business needs prior to the delivery of goods or performance of services. For lease obligations, please refer to Note 7 “Leases” for more details. For the Convertible Senior Notes obligation and other borrowings, please refer to Note 8 “Borrowings” for more details.
Performance Obligations
As of March 31, 2024, we had $9.1 million of performance obligations, which comprised of total deferred revenue and customer order deposits. We currently expect to recognize approximately 58% of deferred revenue as revenue within the next twelve months and the remaining amount is expected to be recognized as revenues in 2025.
Litigation
From time to time, we are involved in a variety of claims, lawsuits, investigations, and proceedings relating to securities laws, product liability, intellectual property, commercial, insurance, contract disputes, employment, and other
matters. Certain of these lawsuits and claims are described in further detail below. We intend to defend vigorously against all of the following allegations.
A liability and related charge to earnings are recorded in the condensed consolidated financial statements for legal contingencies when the loss is considered probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated. The assessment is re-evaluated each accounting period and is based on all available information, including the impact of negotiations, settlements, rulings, advice of legal counsel, and other information and events pertaining to each case. The outcomes of outstanding legal matters are inherently unpredictable and subject to uncertainties. While there can be no assurance of favorable outcome of these legal matters, we currently believe that the outcome of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, liquidity or financial position.
Sopheap Prak et al. v. Enovix Corporation et al., 22CV005846, Superior Court of California, Alameda County
On January 21, 2022, two former machine operator employees filed a putative wage and hour class action lawsuit against Enovix and co-defendant Legendary Staffing, Inc. in the Superior Court of California, County of Alameda. The case is captioned Sopheak Prak & Ricardo Pimentel v Enovix Corporation and Legendary Staffing, Inc., 22CV005846. The Prak complaint alleges, among other things, on a putative class-wide basis, that the defendants failed to pay all overtime wages and committed meal period, rest period and wage statement violations under the California Labor Code and applicable Wage Orders. The plaintiffs are seeking unpaid wages, statutory penalties and interest and reasonable costs and attorney fees. In September 2022, we began the mediation process. Court proceedings related to the matter are ongoing. Based on our current knowledge of the legal proceeding, an estimate of possible loss liability was recorded on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of March 31, 2024. Based on currently available information, we do not expect it to be material to our financial position.
Kody Walker v. Enovix Corporation, 23CV028923. Superior Court of California, Alameda County
On March 8, 2023, a former employee filed a putative class action lawsuit against Enovix in the Superior Court of California, County of Alameda (the “Walker Complaint”). The Walker Complaint alleges, among other things, on a putative class-wide basis, that we failed to pay minimum wages, overtime and sick time wages, failed to reimburse employees for required expenses, failed to provide meal and rest periods and issued inaccurate wage statement under the California Labor Code and applicable Wage Orders. The Walker Complaint asserts on an individual basis that Walker was constructively discharged. The plaintiff seeks unpaid wages, statutory penalties and interest and reasonable costs and attorney fees. While we are unable to predict the likely outcome of this matter or the potential cost or exposure or duration of the process, based on the information we currently possess, we do not expect the total potential cost to be material to our financial position.
Securities Class Action Complaint
On January 6, 2023, a purported Company stockholder filed a securities class action complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California against Enovix and certain of our current and former officers and directors. The complaint alleges that defendants violated Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder by making material misstatements or omissions in public statements related to our manufacturing scale-ups and testing of new equipment. A substantially identical complaint was filed on January 25, 2023 by another purported Company stockholder. Following consolidation of the cases and court appointment of two purported Company stockholder lead plaintiffs, a consolidated complaint alleging substantially similar claims, including allegations that the defendants made material misstatements or omissions in public statements related to testing of new equipment, was filed on July 7, 2023. The consolidated complaint seeks unspecified damages, interest, fees and costs on behalf of all persons and entities who purchased and/or acquired shares of Enovix or RSVAC’s common stock between June 24, 2021 and January 3, 2023. Enovix and our named officers and directors moved to dismiss the complaint on September 15, 2023. On January 30, 2024, the court granted the motion to dismiss with leave to amend. The plaintiffs filed an amended complaint on March 19, 2024. Enovix and its named officers and directors moved to dismiss the amended complaint on May 3, 2024.
Guarantees and Indemnifications
In the normal course of business, we enter into contracts and agreements that contain a variety of representations and warranties and provide for general indemnifications. In addition, we purchased performance bonds for guarantee of our performance obligations for certain projects. Our exposure under these agreements is unknown because it involves claims that may be made against us in the future but have not yet been made. To date, we have not paid any claims or
been required to defend any action related to our indemnification obligations. However, we may record charges in the future as a result of these indemnification obligations.
We also have indemnification obligations to our officers and directors for specified events or occurrences, subject to some limits, while they are serving at our request in such capacities. There have been no claims to date and we have director and officer insurance that may enable us to recover a portion of any amounts paid for future potential claims. We believe the fair value of these indemnification agreements is minimal. Accordingly, we have not recorded any liabilities relating to these obligations for the period presented.
|